This week discussed Number Sense, and Numeration.
I enjoyed the video with Jo Boaler on brain crossing. She connects with the way our brain interprets, and conceptualizes information. The idea that we can reformulate how we discover math was very interesting to me that our number sense will light up when activated by the visualization ideas like estimating numbers and accessing symbols that flow across the entire brain pathway.
Developing Math Literacy:
Students at the J/I level are at a transitional stage where mathematics will help sculpt the success they have in secondary, and ultimately impact their career paths. Generally, a sound understanding will have all the variables relating to real world issues. Addressing the importance of richness to connections, “teachers must be agents of change that they did not
experience as students” (Anderson, D. S. & Piazza, J. A.,
1996.)
Minds
on: Suggests how to get students mentally engaged
in the first minutes of the class and establishes a positive
classroom climate, making every minute of the math class count for
every student.
Action!
suggests
how to group students and what instructional strategy to use. The
instructional strategy chosen outlines an effective way to support
students in learning the specific concept or skill. These strategies
reinforce the connections with literacy and learning for life, as
appropriate.
Consolidate/Debrief
suggests
ways to ‘pull out the math,’ check for conceptual understanding,
and prepare students for the follow-up activity or next lesson.
Often this involves whole class discussion and sharing. Students
listen and contribute to reflections on alternate approaches,
different solutions, extensions, and connections.
These are the types of lesson plans we reviewed in class! This was an eye opening experience for me as I did not fully understand the expectations of broader based learning until today.
We explored this question and were asked to find multiple ways to solve it. At first I was frustrated because I couldn't think of an answer. Then another group started giving examples like, area, money etc. I began to analyze the question further as follows:
If 4 Quarters equals $1 then 28 Quaters is $7. Therefore, 25 X 28 = 700. Where as before my mind would of directed to finding out what X 25 equals 28 with no reasoning for that logic, or formula.
Dan Meyer's Talk is where I discovered my reasonsing for the process rather than the answer. He showed a pyramid of pennies, he has them ask questions as to what factors they needed to know to get the results. He introduced the formula at the end. However, the questions was not assessed based on correct, or incorrect. The question was based on closest answer. Proving to me that the process of inquiry was far more valuable than the outcome. On my first observation day I learn't that the mathematics curriculum is no longer based on a scoring guide, but rather a rubric of best suitable response. I really enjoy this as it allows for students to feel more confident, that their way of solving a problem has a safe space to resonate.